Alex Salmond case is about basic principles of justice and how Scotland is run – Brian Wilson

This week, we had the kind of spin-doctoring exercise which heightens distrust of the process. Private exchanges among complainants in the Salmond court case were unanimously judged irrelevant by the committee, having viewed them in private.

Well, of course they were. These were not sought by the committee who asked for material "relevant to its remit". The Crown Office offered them up while communications of legitimate interest – including messages involving Peter Murrell and other SNP officials, nothing to do with the complainants – remain unproduced.

Even before committee members had seen what the Crown Office gave it, Scottish government special advisers were briefing on the content and how, when the committee showed no interest, Mr Salmond’s case would be in ruins. Given the evidence released was solely for the committee’s use, one wonders how special advisers knew anything about the content. Perhaps there could be another inquiry.

The whole circus must now be in imminent danger of collapse, which, on balance, might be more honourable than dignifying a high-level fix and the ludicrous denial of a key witness’s right to be heard.

This is now long past being about Salmond versus Sturgeon, neither my cup of tea. It is about protecting basic principles of justice and shedding light on how Scotland is run.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.